Home
/
Technology insights
/
Decentralized applications
/

Ai agents set to trade real money, but infrastructure lacks

AI Agents Face Major Hurdle in Trading Real Money on-Chain | Infrastructure Lacks Readiness

By

Lucas Rodriguez

Jun 9, 2026, 10:45 PM

Edited By

Daniel Wu

3 minutes reading time

An illustration of a digital AI agent working on a computer with financial charts and money symbols, showing its role in trading real money portfolios.

A wave of AI agents set to manage real money on-chain could disrupt the crypto landscape. However, critical flaws in existing infrastructure fuel concerns about the agents' ability to execute trades safely. Some operators have already deployed these agents, raising alarms about risk management.

The Rise of AI Trading Agents

Traditionally, AI discussions revolved around chatbots and memecoins, but a new chapter has begun. Autonomous agents are now responsible for managing real portfolios and executing trading strategies. Yet, this evolution brings forward significant challenges created by current decentralized finance (DeFi) systems.

In the decentralized world, human intuition plays a crucial role. When trading on a decentralized exchange (DEX), individuals can assess slippage and question price discrepancies. As one commenter noted, "You can see when a fill looks suspicious or when youโ€™re getting front-run.โ€ AI agents, however, lack this instinct.

Issues with Current Infrastructure

As the crypto community shifts towards AI-driven trading, the infrastructure remains largely human-centric. Existing mechanisms are designed for manual oversight, meaning they can't accommodate the programmatic nature of AI agents.

"An agent submits orders programmatically and trusts that the execution layer did its job. It canโ€™t โ€˜feelโ€™ that a fill was off," a developer explained.

This gap creates vulnerabilities in trading environments:

  • Automated Market Makers (AMMs): Risk of miner extractable value (MEV) baked into designs.

  • Off-Chain Order Books: Lack of transparency in matching and execution.

  • Opaque Trading Venues: Operators can reorder trades without notice, affecting fairness.

Need for a Verifiable Execution Layer

Without significant changes, value may be silently extracted from agents, leading to widespread losses. A solution lies in developing a verifiable execution layer that ensures transparency and accountability. Saying goodbye to vague commitments, the execution should be cryptographically provable, ensuring every fill and state transition is checkable.

โ€œThe execution layer itself needs to be verifiable,โ€ said one expert highlighting the distinction between custody and execution risks.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿšจ Current DeFi infrastructure is unsuitable for AI agents.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Significant risks arise from automated trading processes.

  • ๐Ÿ”‘ A verifiable execution layer is critical for safe agent-driven trading.

  • ๐Ÿ” โ€œNobody competent is handing raw private keys to a model,โ€ reflects a developer's assurance regarding risk management practices.

As we enter this new phase of blockchain trading, questions loom large: Will AI agents be able to trade significant volumes in the next one to two years? Further infrastructure improvements are crucial for their secure integration into DeFi.

Future Trading Landscape

Experts suggest there's a strong chance that in the next couple of years, we will see a shift towards a more robust infrastructure in the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector. Key players recognize the need to create a verifiable execution layer, which could mitigate risks associated with AI trading agents. With ongoing discussions among developers and the community demanding transparency and security, the probability of effective implementations is estimated at around 60% within the next 18 to 24 months. If these improvements transpire, we may see AI agents managing larger trading volumes while significantly minimizing potential losses due to weaknesses in the current systems.

Echoes of History in Financial Innovation

A non-obvious parallel can be drawn to the advent of automated teller machines (ATMs) in the late 20th century. Initially, banks were hesitant to fully embrace this technology due to fears about security and customer confidence. Yet, as infrastructure improved and regulations adapted, ATMs became integral to banking, revolutionizing how consumers managed their finances. Similarly, the crypto landscape may now be at a crossroads. If developers can successfully strengthen the execution framework for AI traders, these agents might very well become the norm in digital finance, much like how ATMs transformed everyday banking. The journey from skepticism to widespread adoption could very well echo in the halls of crypto innovation.