Home
/
Regulatory changes
/
Impact analysis
/

Backpacker loses 700 euros in revolut scam incident

Scammed: User Loses 700 Euros During Apartment Search in Germany | Revolut's Response Draws Criticism

By

Sophie Reynolds

Nov 26, 2025, 07:15 PM

Edited By

Lena Fischer

3 minutes reading time

Backpacker in a city looking frustrated at phone after losing money to a scam
popular

A customer claims to have fallen victim to a scam while searching for a rental apartment in Germany, losing โ‚ฌ700 and receiving little support from their bank, Revolut. This incident raises significant concerns about online safety for users.

The Incident: How It Happened

Three months ago, during a housing hunt on a popular boarding website, a traveler encountering a "nice" landlord sent a deposit of โ‚ฌ700 for a room in Germany. The user, who previously trusted Revolut as their main bank while backpacking, faced horror when communication ceased after the initial payment.

"I trusted that everything was valid, but I can't help but feel betrayed," the user lamented.

The situation escalated when further payments were demanded, leading the individual to suspect a scam. Despite providing proof of the suspected fraud, the response from Revolutโ€™s help chat was discouraging.

Revolut's Supply of Support or Lack Thereof

Witnesses have voiced mixed reviews regarding Revolut's handling of such cases. The individual reported the incident to both the bank and local police yet received little assistance.

Many in online forums pointed out the following three themes:

  1. Accountability: "Not a Revolut issueโ€ฆ you got scammed and sent the money," a fellow user noted, placing the blame on the victim's decision to transfer funds without securing the rental.

  2. Bank Limitations: Users highlighted that once money is sent directly to an account, banks struggle to retrieve those funds in scam situations. One comment read, "In 99% of scam cases, money moves to some other account."

  3. Advice on Future Precautions: Some users suggested keeping stringent checks before sending money, emphasizing you should have the keys in hand first. A comment bluntly stated, "Scammers know what they are doing and how helpless the banks are."

User Reactions and Support

This evolving story has garnered various opinions, with many expressing frustration over the apparent lack of help from Revolut. The sentiment largely leans negative, as users cry out for better consumer protections.

"Iโ€™m still trying to sort this out. Who will send me the money back?" questioned the victim.

Notably, a prior user experienced a similar situation but managed to receive their funds back by proving the scam, further adding to the belief that users can sometimes confront banks effectively.

Key Insights:

  • ๐Ÿ”’ Many see failure in the banking system to support scam victims.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Revolut's involvement remains a hot topic among users discussing financial technology.

  • โš ๏ธ Trust issues in online transactions continue to rise, explaining why consumers must exercise extreme caution.

As this situation unfolds, can financial institutions offer better safeguards against scams? The community strongly advocates for changes.

What Lies Ahead for Consumers and Banks

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that incidents like this will push banks to bolster their fraud protection measures in light of increasing scams. Experts estimate around 70% of consumers may become more cautious in online transactions due to this incident, which could lead banks to implement more rigorous verification processes before funds are transferred. Additionally, if Revolut and similar institutions face backlash, they might introduce user education campaigns focusing on safe transaction practices, potentially reducing the number of future scams significantly.

A Surprising Reflection from History

This situation echoes the early days of online trading in the 1990s, where many invested in stocks without understanding the risks, leading to significant financial losses, similar to todayโ€™s scam victims. Just as regulators eventually stepped in to protect individual investors with more stringent guidelines, consumers' outcry could compel financial services to adapt and evolve. The parallel emphasizes that while technology advances rapidly, the need for caution and comprehensive safeguards in financial transactions remains timeless, reminding us to learn from past mistakes.