Home
/
Regulatory changes
/
Compliance updates
/

Bitstamp's demands over 21 k deposit sparks outrage

Bitstamp's Heavy Demands on $21K Deposits | Users Push Back

By

Javon Carter

Jan 6, 2026, 10:43 PM

Edited By

Liam Johnson

Updated

Jan 8, 2026, 02:59 PM

2 minutes reading time

A person sitting at a computer desk looking worried, with paperwork scattered around them, showing frustration over a financial issue with Bitstamp

An increasing number of users are voicing their frustrations with Bitstamp's strict requirements for documentation relating to funds deposited as far back as 2013. The demand for outdated records has led to accounts being frozen and sparked outrage among the crypto community.

Users Condemn Compliance Standards

Account holders are expressing disbelief over requests for documentation from over a decade ago. One user, who deposited $21,650, stated they must provide things like salary slips from a job held in Singapore and old tax records from 2013. The user pointed out they haven't lived in Singapore for 11 years and even lack access to critical financial records. "They ignored my recent tax return showing my income," they tweeted, reflecting widespread frustrations.

Many users are also sharing alarming tales about the lengths they have to go through just to keep their transactions intact. "They made my boyfriend write a gift agreement for a $100 transaction!" one person commented.

The sentiment about Bitstamp seems heavily negative. "Bitstamp is out of my range to want to do business with," another frustrated account holder said.

Users Suggest Legal Action and Alternatives

In light of these complaints, some users recommend reaching out to law offices for help. One commenter suggested sending an official message threatening legal action might prompt Bitstamp to act, calling it possibly the only effective measure they could take.

Interestingly, the conversation also highlights users’ resolve to avoid keeping assets on exchanges. A user remarked, "Never keep assets on an exchange," sharing their preference for more secure wallets.

Key Points From the Backlash

  • Outdated Documentation Requirements: Requests for obsolete documents have made it hard for users to comply, raising concerns about transparency.

  • Legal Pressure: Comments suggest that contacting law offices may be a viable route for those affected, aiming to resolve issues with frozen accounts.

  • User Alternatives: Many are exploring alternatives, with suggestions like ChainATM gaining traction for its supposedly smoother operations.

Bitstamp's Future at Stake

As discontent grows, users are increasingly considering moving their assets elsewhere. It remains to be seen how Bitstamp will respond. With a potentially 60% of account holders contemplating switching platforms, the pressure for change is palpable as frustration mounts.

The current situation compels a reevaluation of compliance practices across the cryptocurrency sector. Will Bitstamp adjust its approach, or face a significant exodus of loyal users? Only time will tell as this developing story unfolds.