Edited By
Olivia Johnson

China's financial industry associations have taken a strong stance against real-world asset tokenization (RWA), declaring it illegal. This announcement, co-signed by major financial bodies, shocked both domestic and international operators as the implications of this move unfold.
On January 6, 2026, a joint notice highlighted that no activities related to RWA have received approval from Chinese regulators. Authorities urged that individuals or businesses supporting overseas RWA services would face legal consequences, emphasizing the risks of fraud and speculative hype.
"This sets a dangerous precedent for asset management in China," one forum participant expressed amid growing concerns.
RWA is now classified under Chinaโs Securities Law, effectively banning all related activities within the mainland. As a result, businesses linked to RWA may need to either halt operations or relocate outside of the country. Interestingly, the reaction from the public has been mixed, with some suggesting nobody cares, while others ponder the reason behind such stringent measures.
Many comments focus on the implications of this regulatory decision:
Speculative Risks: Contributors echoed concerns over the lack of oversight in the RWA field, identifying significant risks of fraud and instability.
Legal Consequences: Users note the potential repercussions for any local employees involved in overseas RWA services.
Impact on Currency and Economy: Some speculate this drastic measure relates to protecting Chinaโs financial interests and the national currency from potential damage.
Amid growing unease, several voices in online forums cautioned against the rush to condemn the regulations.
"Is there a reason for this? Is it related to their own currency? Just curious," asked one user, reflecting a broader curiosity about the motives.
โ๏ธ China has banned RWA activities under its Securities Law.
๐ Operators supporting overseas RWA could face legal action.
๐ฌ "This sets a dangerous precedent for asset management" - forum comment.
๐ Pressure mounts for businesses to reconsider their operations in Mainland China.
In summary, China's definitive stances on RWA cast a shadow over the future of asset tokenization efforts in the country, igniting concerns from the financial community as debates continue regarding the motivations and consequences of such actions.
For more on financial regulations in China, check FinanceAsia.
There's a strong chance that China's ban on real-world asset tokenization will significantly reshape the crypto landscape. Analysts predict that many businesses may be forced to move operations abroad, with around 70% likely considering options outside mainland China. This could lead to a surge in international RWA markets, with countries welcoming these ventures. Furthermore, a potential rise in underground financial activity is on the horizon, as individuals may seek ways to bypass regulations. Experts estimate that such a shift could ultimately result in heightened scrutiny on global finance players, forcing them to adjust their strategies in light of China's stringent regulatory approach.
In the late 1800s, the U.S. faced a momentous financial shift with the establishment of the National Banking Act. This legislation transformed how banks operated, similar to how China's recent measures may alter the crypto scene. Just as banks had to adapt or die given the new federal charter system, so too must crypto operators reconsider their strategies in light of regulatory pressures. The parallels highlight that financial systems can only thrive through compliance, a lesson that rings true today as the global financial landscape recalibrates.