Home
/
Regulatory changes
/
Compliance updates
/

What happens if you don't report staking rewards?

Taxing Times for Stakers | Users Face Consequences for Unreported Rewards

By

Hannah Schmidt

Jan 7, 2026, 08:28 AM

3 minutes reading time

Person calculating taxes with crypto rewards and IRS forms
popular

A rising wave of anxiety grips crypto stakers who haven't reported their rewards. Many are unaware that staking rewards are taxed as regular income upon receipt, igniting concern over potential IRS penalties in 2026 when exchanges must report more data.

The Reality of Staking Rewards and Taxes

Recent discussions in user boards reveal a significant gap in understanding tax obligations related to staking. A user shared their experience, stating that despite not selling any of their staked crypto, they discovered that staking rewards are considered taxable income the moment they are received. This misconception has led many to overlook their reporting duties.

"This is a big misconception Just because you donโ€™t hit the threshold to receive a 1099 doesnโ€™t mean you donโ€™t have to report it," a community member pointed out.

Growing Concern and IRS Letters

The anxiety has increased after reports of individuals receiving letters from the IRS about unreported crypto income. One user mentioned using CoinLedger to calculate taxes owed and reported their rewards as "other income" on Schedule 1 after filing amended returns. Notably, they highlighted that penalties were less severe than expected when taking proactive steps to report.

Several commenters echoed the sentiment:

  • One user stated, "If it isnโ€™t something super significant, youโ€™ll likely just get an additional bill."

  • Others advised filing amended returns, emphasizing that itโ€™s better to handle the situation early rather than later.

Tools and Strategies for Compliance

Tools like CoinLedger and Crypto Tax Calculator are recommended for users grappling with their tax obligations. These resources can streamline the reporting process for staking rewards, making compliance less daunting.

As one commenter remarked, "Get with a tax consultant address moving forward." The community seems to agree that understanding obligations is crucial.

Key Insights from the Discussion

  • ๐Ÿ”บ Most rewards are taxable upon receipt, not at the time of sale.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ IRS reporting requirements are tightening, with exchanges expected to share more data going forward.

  • โœ… Proactive reporting can reduce penalties, easing the stress of back taxes.

Final Thoughts

As 2026 approaches, those involved in staking should double-check their tax obligations. The growing pressure from both the IRS and community discussions suggests that ignorance could lead to hefty fines and financial strain.

Users who share their experiences can help others navigate these complicated waters, ensuring that everyone stays compliant in this evolving landscape.

Prospects for Stakers in a Tightened Tax Climate

As the IRS ramps up reporting requirements, there's a strong probability that more stakers will face scrutiny regarding their tax responsibilities. Estimates suggest that around 40% of crypto stakers may not fully understand their obligations, which will likely lead to increased audits and penalties in the near future, especially with 2026 approaching. Experts believe proactive measures, like using tax tools and consulting professionals, can reduce the risk of hefty fines, making compliance easier. However, as more people become aware of the tax implications, itโ€™s probable that we will also see a surge in the adoption of clearer communication strategies from exchanges regarding tax responsibilities.

Historical Echoes of Compliance

The current situation with stakers mirrors the early days of the e-commerce boom in the late 1990s. Back then, many online sellers were unaware of the need for sales tax compliance, leading to a wave of audits as states caught up with digital transactions. Just as now, those who proactively sought guidance found themselves in better positions than those who ignored the changes. The parallels are striking; in both instances, adapting to regulatory shifts required a blend of awareness and timely action to avoid future pitfalls.