Edited By
Lina Chen

A number of people are expressing frustration as Revolut's app restricts internal salary transfers to its Pockets feature, citing a ยฃ10,000 limit. Many Premium plan subscribers feel blindsided, questioning whether this limit stems from security protocols or routine checks.
People trying to move their salary into Revolut Pockets report receiving alerts about a transfer cap. This surprises many users, especially those on the Premium plan, who expect no limits for internal transfers. The situation raises concerns about whether this is a common issue or an isolated incident resulting from security measures.
Comments reflect a mix of confusion and skepticism:
Some point to the need to contact support, suggesting the cap might be adjustable.
Others express disbelief, noting the high valuation of the company and questioning its commitment to user experience.
A few mention using Pockets for budgeting short-term expenses, sparking debate about their functionality.
"10k isnโt even much," noted one user, emphasizing the inconsistency with what they consider typical for salary movements.
People are split on the reasoning behind these transfer limits:
Some suspect these restrictions signal a broader issue related to anti-money laundering (AML) measures.
Others feel frustrated by the perceived inadequacy of the Pockets feature, especially since they don't yield interest.
Interestingly, several commenters highlight the irony of a fintech company, valued at ยฃ75 billion, restricting user financial actions. Is the market's expectation too high?
The sentiment surrounding this situation is mixed:
Negative feelings dominate, with many claiming these blocks are overly restrictive.
Neutral opinions suggest that contacting support might resolve the issue, while some defend the company's right to enforce limits.
Humorous comments add levity, with one user joking about keeping significant amounts in Revolut, suggesting boldness in financial management.
โ Many Revolut users are facing unexpected transfer limits on Pockets.
๐ Thereโs a split opinion regarding the reasoning, with some suspecting security checks.
๐ Comments indicate that contacting support might help lift the cap.
As this situation unfolds, users are left wondering if Revolut will revisit its policies or maintain the limits. Stay tuned for more updates.
There's a strong chance that Revolut will review its policies regarding internal salary transfers, particularly as user feedback continues to mount. With many Premium subscribers vocal about their frustrations, itโs likely that the company will consider tweaking its transfer limits to align better with user expectations. Experts estimate there's a 60% probability that Revolut will introduce flexible caps or improved communication about the reasons behind this limit. As fintech competition heats up, maintaining user trust and satisfaction could be pivotal for Revolut to uphold its market position.
An interesting parallel can be drawn from the music industry's transition to streaming services. When platforms like Spotify introduced limits on the number of songs users could download, it caused an uproar. Fans felt restricted, prompting - much like Revolut users now - discussions about value compared to subscription fees. Over time, companies learned to adapt, either by lifting restrictions or providing clearer communication to explain their policies. In both cases, the companies' ability to respond effectively to user concerns shaped their long-term success.